Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: NFL.com: Broncos, Bears agree on deal for Cutler


Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date: Apr 2 5:25 PM, 2009
NFL.com: Broncos, Bears agree on deal for Cutler
Permalink  
 


Broncos, Bears agree on deal for Cutler

The Broncos have agreed in principle to trade QB Jay Cutler to the Chicago Bears, the team announced Thursday.

It's across the top of the page at NFL.com.

Now I guess things get a little awkward, eh?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date: Apr 2 5:38 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

If reports are right it was a king's ransom too. Two Firsts (2009 and 2010), a Third (assume 2009 but have not seen that reported yet) and Orton for Cutler and a Fifth.



__________________
Ax


Status: Offline
Posts: 4
Date: Apr 2 5:43 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Well, I, for one, am thrilled we didn't trade for him, and even more thrilled that it's finally over.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date: Apr 2 5:48 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Neophyte wrote:

If reports are right it was a king's ransom too. Two Firsts (2009 and 2010), a Third (assume 2009 but have not seen that reported yet) and Orton for Cutler and a Fifth.



Yikes. I wasn't necessarily opposed to trading for him per se, but that price is just insane. I'd be livid if we gave up that kind of package.

 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date: Apr 2 6:18 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Larry Brown #43 wrote

Yikes. I wasn't necessarily opposed to trading for him per se, but that price is just insane. I'd be livid if we gave up that kind of package.

 

 




Yeah, I was growing enamored with the idea of Cutler possibly coming.

After seeing the cost, I'm both glad we didn't pay that freight and surprised that we didn't pay that freight. 



__________________
(a/k/a Monte51Coleman)


Status: Offline
Posts: 54
Date: Apr 2 6:23 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Assuming that cost is right (and I have not been able to confirm it yet so who knows...), I wonder if McDaniels liked Orton better than Campbell. Can't imagine Vinny and Danny not being willing to toss in a third as well to met the competition. *shrug*

Just glad we did not do it.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 56
Date: Apr 2 7:01 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

DS: Well see Jason, we weren't really....

JC: weirdface.gif

DS: I mean, we weren't gonna....

JC: weirdface.gif

DS: Awkwaaaaarrrd. paranoid


__________________
Om


Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Date: Apr 2 8:52 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

You know, it could be this isn't over yet.  Wouldn't be the first time there was a third-party deal in the works.  Maybe the Bears really want someone else (like Campbell, say), but needed someone (like Cutler, say) to pry him loose from the Redskins ... who do, after all, really, really like Jason and will need some more wooing.




__________________

Back to The Future Is Now



Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date: Apr 2 9:07 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Om wrote:

You know, it could be this isn't over yet.  Wouldn't be the first time there was a third-party deal in the works.  Maybe the Bears really want someone else (like Campbell, say), but needed someone (like Cutler, say) to pry him loose from the Redskins ... who do, after all, really, really like Jason and will need some more wooing.




Well, I agree that it may not be over--I could still see us trading Campbell somewhere--but I think it's over as far as the Bears are concerned. I think they could have had Csmpbell fairly cheaply if they really wanted him, without going to thr trouble of trading for Cutler.



__________________
Om


Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Date: Apr 2 9:15 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Larry Brown #43 wrote:

 

Well, I agree that it may not be over--I could still see us trading Campbell somewhere--but I think it's over as far as the Bears are concerned. I think they could have had Csmpbell fairly cheaply if they really wanted him, without going to thr trouble of trading for Cutler.

 


Dammit, we're going to have to upgrade sooner than I thought. This board software apparently doesn't transmit tongue-in-cheek. bandana



-- Edited by Om on Thursday 2nd of April 2009 09:16:04 PM

-- Edited by Om on Thursday 2nd of April 2009 09:16:23 PM

__________________

Back to The Future Is Now



Status: Offline
Posts: 28
Date: Apr 2 9:20 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Om wrote:

Dammit, we're going to have to upgrade sooner than I thought. This board software apparently doesn't transmit tongue-in-cheek. bandana



-- Edited by Om on Thursday 2nd of April 2009 09:16:04 PM

-- Edited by Om on Thursday 2nd of April 2009 09:16:23 PM


 My bad Om...I shoulda known. :)



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date: Apr 3 8:43 AM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Assuming Campbell's still the guy for 2009, this quote from the Post article intrigued me. One complaint about Campbell is that he's passionless, too mechanical. I sense a hint of fire in his comments below, a sort of "f-em, I'll show them" mentality.

----

While Campbell conducted himself professionally as the Redskins shopped him, and took the high road again yesterday, he is a proud person and his calm demeanor should not be mistaken as a sign of weakness, a source close to Campbell said.

"In a lot of ways, you have a lot of feelings about this, but there's also a lot of stuff you just keep on the inside," Campbell said. "You just go out there with a little bit more passion, a little bit more of a chip on your shoulder. Out of all of this, something good has got to come out of it.

"Maybe it's just that you stay positive, you keep working hard for the people that matter to you and you keep trying to be the best you can be. I really believe that everything I've gone through only prepares me to be a stronger person and a stronger quarterback. But this also shows you a lot. It shows you your true value to some people."
--
(From the 2nd page of http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/02/AR2009040204148.html )



__________________
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard