Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Boswell -- How Not to Treat the QB


Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Date: Apr 26 12:57 AM, 2009
Boswell -- How Not to Treat the QB
Permalink  
 


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/25/AR2009042503009.html

One more two-hour meeting with Jason Campbell ought to be enough.

The Redskins' brass can explain to him that, even though they tried to move heaven and earth to trade for airhead, pouting, party boy passer Jay Cutler three weeks ago, and despite the fact that they were still trying to trade up to grab USC quarterback Mark Sanchez on draft day yesterday, the team's top executives still love him madly.

Or, as Vinny Cerrato, executive vice president of football operations, said, "Jason was always going to be the starter next season," even if the Redskins had gotten Sanchez.

Would that have been before or after Campbell requested a trade?

The day before the draft, NFL sources said Campbell's agent, Joel Segal, said that if the Redskins drafted Sanchez, Campbell would make a get-out-of-town request.

For the last 10 years, the Redskins have treated far too many people like trash. Maybe that's why their results so often look like "garbage in, garbage out." Now, with their whole Campbell calamity, they risked treating their dignified starting quarterback like disposable refuse. At least that potential showdown has now been avoided.

"We made a couple of calls [about Sanchez], but the price was too high," said Cerrato. In other words, the Redskins would have loved to have landed him, as long as they didn't have to give up their first-round pick next year.

Oh, that should make Campbell feel better, more secure. The Jets traded up with the Browns to get Sanchez. The Redskins didn't have the ammo for a deal like that. The missing ingredient? The Jets had both a first-round (No. 17) and second-round draft pick to offer the Browns, as well as three secondary players. The Redskins only had a first-rounder (No. 13) but no second-rounder. The Redskins used that second-round pick to acquire semi-useless and now-departed defensive end Jason Taylor before last season.

Seldom, in the long annals of the Redskins' soap opera offseasons, has the franchise topped this year's shenanigans. Sometimes they look dopey right away. Sometimes they look smart, at least for a while. And sometimes they hit a jackpot or even lure back Joe Gibbs. But this time, the Redskins have succeeded in both improving their team and undermining it -- simultaneously. Which influence will prove more powerful in '09?

Maybe Brian Orakpo of Texas, chosen by the Redskins with the 13th overall pick, will turn out to be a fine defensive end; the Redskins certainly need one. Orakpo now owns all the college awards with names such as Lombardi, Nagurski and Hendricks engraved on them. Perhaps, as the Redskins claim, Orakpo was even ranked in the "top five players" on their draft board.

With the addition of the 260-pound Orakpo, along with free agents Albert Haynesworth and Derrick Dockery, the Redskins have finally spent an offseason focusing on what they truly need: large, scary linemen like those who once led this franchise to titles.

However, these are the Redskins and nothing can be that simple. This draft and, in fact, this entire month of April will probably be remembered in Redskins history for one primary reason -- the brutal and unnecessary damage the team did to its relationship with Campbell. If only this offseason could be summarized as Haynesworth-Dockery-Orakpo, then the preliminary verdict could be praise. But the impact of recent weeks has been spectacularly mixed. Significant talent was added. But the core team-player relationship -- with the starting quarterback -- has been fundamentally altered.

"I know in my heart I'm a good quarterback, and I'm trying my best. But, yeah, you know that stuff is out there," Campbell said last week of the pursuits of Cutler and Sanchez. "The only thing that makes you a little [upset] through all of it is that it makes you look like you're not a good quarterback and you're not wanted. To any competitor, that's hard. When your team tries to trade for another quarterback, and now all this stuff with Sanchez, it's a tough league and a tough business.

"I just don't like it when you see so much about [the Redskins] trying to get a quarterback. I don't think anybody would like to see that about your job. It just makes you feel like people have thrown you out there like you're just a bad quarterback," Campbell added. "When the tables turn, when you do have that big season, and when you do have those great playoff games, you can look back on it and appreciate how it all helped you get to that point."

If this draft has an irony, it is that the Orakpo addition, which should further improve an already very good defense, is just more good news for Campbell. The more the line play improves, the more likely it becomes that Campbell can lead the team to the playoffs. And the better the Redskins, the better contract Campbell will get after next season -- in Washington or somewhere else.

For the Redskins, there was always a better premise on which to conduct this offseason. First, don't worry about quarterback as your primary issue. Instead, try to build a playoff-caliber team around the quarterback you have and are developing -- one whom Zorn continues to praise. Go ahead: Add a Haynesworth, Dockery and Orakpo. Then give Campbell your full support and confidence to run this improved team.

If you don't like what you see, then make the decision that Campbell isn't your franchise quarterback, your future, the player you want to re-sign. But you can't make that decision, or at least you can't make it sensibly, on the basis of his work with an 8-8 team with basic problems along both lines of scrimmage.

Just three weeks ago, after Campbell, owner Daniel M. Snyder, Cerrato and Zorn had their two-hour air-clearing meeting after the Cutler fiasco, Campbell said that he was determined to become "the type of quarterback Mr. Snyder wants." He added, touchingly, "I trust Coach Zorn."

In just three weeks since then, that tone has changed. Campbell still talks about his desire to improve, how much he wants to help his team and learn his coach's offense. But the names of two people have not crossed his lips: Snyder and Cerrato.

Many a lifelong Redskin fan has, sadly, felt the need to make a similar distinction during the past decade: pull for the team and the coach, but draw the line at those in the suite seats who seldom seem to be in touch with reality on the field.

Now, for the first time, the Redskins' starting quarterback seems to be in the same ambivalent position as vast numbers of the team's fans. And he's barely mincing words.

When the '09 Redskin season begins, the broad-based support for Campbell with his 84.3 passer rating and only six interceptions in '08 will probably be far stronger, both in the stands and the locker room, than it has ever been.

Who knows? Perhaps Campbell will play better than he ever has if he doesn't worry about pleasing "Mr. Snyder" and others who would be delighted to supplant him.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 24
Date: Apr 26 8:26 AM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Please. It should be very obvious that in the NFL, when a team spends a first round (or more) pick on you, that there will be high expectations laid on you. IF you don't produce, you'll be replaced. It happens all the time. It happens to every team. This isn't new.

It's amusing this guy talks about the "reality on the field" as if we have some pro bowl QB that the FO is trying to replace just for the heck of it. Like say, Denver?


__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date: Apr 26 10:34 AM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Heaven forbid a team tries to upgrade itself at the most important position on the field.

The ball is now firmly in Jason's hands. Let's see what he can do with it.

__________________
(a/k/a Monte51Coleman)


Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Date: Apr 26 3:02 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Chris wrote:

Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

Heaven forbid a team tries to upgrade itself at the most important position on the field.

The ball is now firmly in Jason's hands. Let's see what he can do with it.



But, is quarterback the team's biggest weakness right now?  I think not.  JC has made mistakes and he needs to improve.  But, the offensive woes aren't all his fault.  The team has mishandled this entire issue.

 



__________________
Om


Status: Offline
Posts: 126
Date: Apr 26 5:39 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

How should they have handled it, KB?

Actively trying to upgrade the QB spot is something every single team that doesn't have an established one needs to do. The Redskins have been trying to stabilize that position for 23 years with no success ... and Jason, for all his nice-guyness and physical prowess, has been so far, at best, serviceable. Yes the team has had problems that have hurt his development ... but so has he failed to make much happen on his own. Ultimately, that last part is what sets the serviceable NFL QB from the franchise NFL QB.

I'm not a fan of the process, either---I would much rather not have to have hurt Jason's feelings and everyone roast marshmallows together. But end of the day, as a professional quarterback with four season under his belt, he has still yet to show that he is clearly The Man and that all they have to do is give him a little more help to put him over the top.  At least, he hasn't shown it to the head coach and front office.

So what should the team have done? 


-- Edited by Om on Sunday 26th of April 2009 05:40:50 PM

__________________

Back to The Future Is Now



Status: Offline
Posts: 68
Date: Apr 26 6:07 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

KB24 wrote:
But, is quarterback the team's biggest weakness right now?  I think not.  JC has made mistakes and he needs to improve.  But, the offensive woes aren't all his fault.  The team has mishandled this entire issue.

 

 




I think that Jason is a swell guy and I sincerely hope that he has a coming-out party type of of season in '09-'10.

 

However, in my opinion, he is currently the fourth best qb in a four team division and the equivalent of a human bye-week for the other NFCE defensive coordinators. I doubt that they lose much sleep worrying about how Jason can beat them.

 

If a team has a chance to land a guy at the position that can, they absolutely need to investigate the possibility. Not to do so because a players feelings might get hurt would be silly.

 



__________________
(a/k/a Monte51Coleman)


Status: Offline
Posts: 76
Date: Apr 26 7:25 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

Om wrote:

How should they have handled it, KB?

Actively trying to upgrade the QB spot is something every single team that doesn't have an established one needs to do. The Redskins have been trying to stabilize that position for 23 years with no success ... and Jason, for all his nice-guyness and physical prowess, has been so far, at best, serviceable. Yes the team has had problems that have hurt his development ... but so has he failed to make much happen on his own. Ultimately, that last part is what sets the serviceable NFL QB from the franchise NFL QB.

I'm not a fan of the process, either---I would much rather not have to have hurt Jason's feelings and everyone roast marshmallows together. But end of the day, as a professional quarterback with four season under his belt, he has still yet to show that he is clearly The Man and that all they have to do is give him a little more help to put him over the top.  At least, he hasn't shown it to the head coach and front office.

So what should the team have done? 


-- Edited by Om on Sunday 26th of April 2009 05:40:50 PM



Om, I hear what you're saying, but I still have to go back to what I said before.  It's unfair to compare JC to other four-year quarterbacks because he's had to learn three offensive systems in his four years.  Zorn, himself, and Matt Hasselback said that it takes two-to-three years to really master the WCO.  Yet, everyone is ready to throw JC under the bus after just one year in this new offense.  Keep in mind, too, that Jay Cutler's career record isn't that much better than Jason's (his 17-20 versus Jason's 16-20), he hasn't won a playoff game and in a comparison, JC's strengths are Cutler's weaknesses, and vice-versa.  Yes, Jason has made mistakes and needs to step up, but is it really his fault that, by the time he makes his first read, he has a defender in his face?  Is it his fault the receivers run the wrong patterns and drop passes?  Is it his fault that, outside of Santana Moss, he really doesn't have a reliable receiver?  Changing the quarterback won't change those other factors.  If anything, it would set us back a year or two.  I might add that JC went a good 200-plus passes without throwing an interception and did that throwing a lot of short-to-medium-range passes, which are among the hardest to complete.  That doesn't sound like a bad quarterback to me. 

What would I have done?  First, the Derrick Dockery signing notwithstanding, I would have focused more on shoring up the offensive lines.  That's the offensive unit's biggest weakest right now.  Randy Thomas is coming off off-season neck surgery and right tackle is a big question mark, given Jon Jansen's recent ineffectiveness and questions about Stephon Heyer's fundamentals.  We also have VERY little O-line depth, which will come back to haunt us should we suffer a catastrophic injury or two there.  I'd also take a look at the wide receivers, specifically Malcolm Kelly's knees and Devin Thomas' desire.  If anyone needs a fight lit under them it's those two guys. 

Whether or not you like JC as our starting quarterback, you have to admit that the organization unnecessarily let him dangle in the wind and made all of the offensive woes out to be his fault.  To me, that's not the way to motivate players.  If anything, it turns them against the organization and creates problems in the locker room.   


 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 56
Date: Apr 27 12:08 AM, 2009
Permalink  
 

I'm with KB on this. I fully understand the issue of performance. However, your QB either is or is not your QB. If JC isn't going to be our guy, the time to upgrade is after he doesn't cut it next season (either during or after the season).

However, absent Peyton Manning or Tom Brady being available, one simply doesn't do what we did to JC or anyone else and expect that it won't hurt more than the QB's feelings. Just my .02

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 7
Date: May 25 10:17 PM, 2009
Permalink  
 

My take is slightly different.  Like Om I have no problem with the Cutler dalliance.  Regardless of the fans perspective, the NFL GM's view Cutler as potentially elite, whereas no one was clamoring for JC.  I respect the FO for their attempt to significantly upgrade the position, and the general consensus from the people in the know is that is exactly what would have happened.  Now was the price too high?  That is another issue to be debated.

Where I side with KB & Yusuf is the impact of pursuing Sanchez.  Unlike Cutler, he is unproven.  Trying to draft him screams that the FO was willing to take a high priced high risk gamble rather than continue with JC.  You don't make a play like this unless you are sure it will happen.  JC is human...his ego is not made of steel and trust had to be a casulty of this affair.  It was a bad move by the FO.

Now let's hope there is enough professionalism on both sides to put it behind them.

 

 



__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard